Law Society Tribunal Decisions and legal issues; civil litigation, family law, corporate and commercial law, real estate and estates. As part of this mandate, the Law Society's Hearing and Appeal Panels recently heard the following matters. Hearing and Appeal Panels are composed of Law Society benchers - lawyers and lay people who are responsible for determining the appropriate disposition of cases.
The notation following a lawyer's name indicates their year of call to the Bar.
Posted on May 11, 2007
Marva Maureen Jemmott (1971), of the City of Brampton, was found to have engaged in professional misconduct for failing to: promptly respond to communications from the Law Society; maintain the books and records of her law practice; cooperate with the audit of her financial records by failing to attend two scheduled spot audits and failing to provide information to the Spot Auditor as requested; act with integrity by verbally representing to the Law Society that she would freeze her trust account, but then continuing to make withdrawals from it; cooperate with an investigation into her conduct by failing to provide information concerning her conduct and failing to provide financial records as required by the Law Society's Forensic Auditor; and for: misappropriating trust funds totaling $35,411.33; misapplying trust funds totaling $8,415.60; mishandling trust funds totaling $9,383.82; issuing trust cheques that were dishonoured by the bank because there were insufficient funds in her trust account; and transferring funds on account of fees from her trust account to her general account without first delivering fees billings.
By Decision and Order dated April 24, 2007,* the Hearing Panel ordered that:
*By Order dated October 18, 2006, the Hearing Panel ordered the matter adjourned on condition that the Member undertake to not practice law.
Posted on May 9, 2007
Winston Gauntlett Mattis (1997), of the City of Brampton
By Decision and Order dated April 25, 2007, the Hearing Panel found that an Order suspending the rights and privileges of the Member on an interlocutory basis is necessary to protect the public and ordered that: